Hi Urs and all, I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated according to the path they are stored in. Should we have a dedicated folder for scheme-modules or shall we store them for example in "includes"?
Best, Jan-Peter Am 05.07.2014 14:28, schrieb Urs Liska: > Am 05.07.2014 10:31, schrieb Urs Liska: >> Thanks. >> I think we will have to reconsider our metadata section and then do the >> transfer in that "reorganization" branch. I strongly suggest to >> excusively do that using pull requests, even among the members with push >> access. >> >> One more thing I would suggest to implement is some more standardization >> for the examples files. These should have formalized headers that are >> created by pulling in the fields from the definitions file. This should >> be quite easy to implement: Create one file with the redefinition of >> \booktitlemarkup and place this somewhere outside the user-accessible >> files. Then each examples file can simply include this with a relative >> path and there you go. >> (-> This implies that our metadata considerations take this into account >> too) >> > > I have updated the Wiki page > https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/wiki > > and added a note about the reorganization process in the README.md on > the restructuring branch. > > Urs > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
