Am Freitag, den 19.04.2013, 12:16 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup: > Urs Liska <li...@ursliska.de> writes: > > > Am Freitag, den 19.04.2013, 11:50 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup: > >> Urs Liska <li...@ursliska.de> writes: > >> > >> >> > If not, would it be possible to highlight a changed note (or other > >> >> > item) with a color? > >> >> > >> >> That can be done. > >> > But recompilation is better. > >> > >> Easy recompilation is nice, but automatic recompilation is a nuisance. > >> Why would an editor not be allowed to batch changes? > > We're not talking of mandatory automatic recompilation, of course. > > If you are saying "recompilation is better", that does not make much > sense unless you _are_ talking about mandatory recompilation.
You're right, I change my opinion on the desirable behaviour: If automatic recompilation is activated then the end of an editing process (e.g. a mouseUp event) should immediately trigger recompilation. If automatic recompilation is deactivated the music view should highlight the changed grob so one sees that it is a 'preview' and not the compiled output. Urs _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
