2013/4/23 Richard Shann <richard.sh...@virgin.net>: > On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 22:11 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> > what would be the nicest syntax using that data? >> >> \shape by David Nalesnik (it's awesome!) Docs are here: >> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes >> note that \shape syntax is a bit different in 2.16. > > I have had a little read of that documentation and it seems that \shape > does not use the same data. It seems that to use \shape you would need > to know the default values of the control points, which I guess could > only be gotten with running LilyPond ...
I'm not sure what you mean. You don't have to know what default conrol points values are to be able to write a call to \shape. It's shape's business to get to the default values and alter them when LilyPond is ran. So, the workflow is: - user adds a slur - user previews Lilypond output - user decides that control points should be adjusted, for example first control point should be moved up by 1 ss - user writes \shape #'((0 . 1)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) Something - when Lily is ran next time, curve will be changed. hth, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
