On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 14:50 +0100, Noeck wrote: > Hi Richard, > > > There is still something not said here: by default LilyPond is printing > > two accidentals in the measure following the line break in the example I > > posted. > > It is.
Sorry, yes, you are quite right (though perhaps my contribution makes it clear that there is not even a foolproof workaround for the current behavior to bring it in line with Gould and the consensus). Richard _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
