Hi, > I don't see the ambiguity.
So, upon seeing the screenshot I sent, you immediately knew that it was a C-natural, even though there's a C-sharp in the key signature and no other [contradicting] accidental? You should be the star of a clairvoyance show in Vegas! ;) > The note is tied anyway and not to be articulated > if I were to start playing from that measure. If I want to play the note I > have to look back anyway. Yes, but if there's no line break, you only have to look back a few cm — If there's a line break, you have to look to the right a much longer distance, then move up a system, register the correct accidental, then do the long return trip to the original note. The "repeated" accidental saves this long processing time. > I don't think this has something to do with classical or non-classical > music or a piece having or not having a key signature. Agreed. Best regards, Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
