TaoCG <tao_lilypondu...@gmx.net> writes: > Kieren MacMillan wrote >> By hiding the accidental after the break, I introduce [unnecessary] >> ambiguity at the beginning of the system, which can only be resolved by >> looking backwards to the end of the last system — it is precisely for this >> reason that Gould (and many others) suggest repeating the accidental after >> a line break. > > I don't see the ambiguity. The note is tied anyway and not to be > articulated if I were to start playing from that measure.
For a note that is tied merely to avoid it crossing the barline (the kind that would not have been tied at all in Renessaince music), maybe. If a choir or orchestra is given instructions "start from measure x", and measure x starts with a long tied note in one voice, that voice will usually be expected to join the harmony. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
