Hello all,
> Gould (page 80) says that a sharp note tied to another across a system break
> should cause the note-tied-to to have a normal accidental, and further notes
> of the same (altered) pitch should have no accidental - exactly as the OP was
> requesting.
I agree with Gould 100%:
1. Without a "tied-to" accidental, "starting at the beginning of the
system" (e.g.) will almost certainly lead to confusion or errors; and,
2. Once there is that initial accidental, the rest of the measure should
act according to whatever accidental rule is in effect.
That being said, giving Lilypond users the option of (e.g.) changing the
tied-to accidental to/from a cautionary is not a horrible idea, in the interest
of flexibility and choice.
Cheers,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
