Am 26.03.2013 13:12, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Richard Shann
<richard.sh...@virgin.net> wrote:
Dear LilyPonders,
When a tied note with accidental ties across a line boundary the
accidental is repeated in the next bar. If there is a further note with
the same accidental, the accidental is repeated, which looks very odd,
as the accidental has already been printed in that bar.
Do you mean the accidentals on frist quarter notes in each measure,
i.e. the second accidental here
\version "2.16.2"
{
ees'4 ees'8 ees'4 ees' ees'8 ~
ees' ees'4 ees' ees' ees'8 ~
}
?
If so, it's printed because music notation rules say so. Notation
rules say that if an altered note is tied across barline, the tied
part after barline "inherits" accidental, but the following notes
don't (as the accidental was in the previous measure), so new
accidental is needed.
Or do you refer to the accidental after the line break?
Anyway, I also think there should be only one accidental in the measure
after the line break (although i don't have a strong opinion on which
one to emend.
If I put an accidental on the first (i.e. the tied note) then I
definitely don't need a second one in that measure.
But maybe I'd suggest to remove the the accidental on the tied note (and
then of course place one before the second note).
Best
Urs
hth,
Janek
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
