On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Urs Liska <li...@ursliska.de> wrote: > Anyway, I also think there should be only one accidental in the measure > after the line break (although i don't have a strong opinion on which one to > emend. > If I put an accidental on the first (i.e. the tied note) then I definitely > don't need a second one in that measure. > But maybe I'd suggest to remove the the accidental on the tied note (and > then of course place one before the second note).
Personally i'd have a cautionary (i.e. parenthesized or smaller) accidental right after the break, and then a regular one. This way the situation is clear. best, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
