Am 10.01.2013 22:26, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:43:42AM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
* Maintain the library's documentation and the tutorials (starting
with Antonio's proposed text on orchestral scores and hopefully with
a conversion of my existing tutorial) as a set of LaTeX documents.
* I think there is no real alternative to this because
Why LaTeX as opposed to texinfo?
You want me to be honest? Because I don't know anything about it.
If it's latex, do you plan to
use latex2html, or simply not offer any html output at all?
So far we're only talking about creating PDF documents.
If anybody steps in (your email partially fulfils this already)
convincing us that it makes sense to switch to something different (and
gives some hints on where to start or ideally offers help) I don't think
anybody will object.
If
you work in texinfo, then material could be added to the main
lilypond documentation, exposing it to more readers.
Do you think that's a realistic option?
Would lilypond documentation be 'open' enough to incorporate material
that might not be too tailored to the given structure or style?
Urs
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
