Keith,
Thanks for an excellent report.
On 9/27/10 11:51 AM, "Keith E OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:
> In "First impressions of alpha test" I wrote:
> My old scores had two situations with missing beams, neither one is a
> simple
> regression:
>
> 1) swung triplets in 2/8 are not beamed. Both 2.12 and 2.13 are missing
> beams, but in different ways. My intention is to report on bug-lilypond
> after giving a bit of time to hear from other users.
> \relative c'' {
> \time 6/16
> c16 c c c8 c16
> \time 2/8
> \times 2/3 {c16 c c} \times 2/3 {c8 c16}
> \scaleDurations #'(2 . 3) {c16 c c c8 c16}
> }
Please report this on bug-lilypond without waiting for more information.
This is a clear bug. (And I'm the author of the code in question).
>
> 2) Both 2.12 and 2.13 miss beams in the middle of a particular cadenza.
> But my minimal example is
> { \override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##t
> \cadenzaOn
> \repeat unfold 4 {c8 c c c \bar""}
> \cadenzaOff
> }
> Removing the stem-support (!) removes the problem, on the Win32 builds.
> Actually, 2.12 drew all the beams in the actual score
> (http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=1776) but started
> to drop beams as I simplified.
This is a very interesting issue.
The following code beams properly, without the override. But it also
reports a warning message:
warning: cannot find or create `Timing' called `'
\version "2.13.34"
\score {
\relative c'' {
\cadenzaOn
\repeat unfold 4 {c8 c c c \bar""}
\cadenzaOff
}
}
But the code below fails to beam the 3rd beat, even though it issues no
warnings.
\version "2.13.34"
\score {
\relative c'' {
\time 4/4
\cadenzaOn
\repeat unfold 4 {c8 c c c \bar""}
\cadenzaOff
}
}
Adding the Fingering override doesn't cause the beaming to work correctly
here, either.
> P.S. My advice to users using the new autobeaming: Read the manual
> backwards, seriously.
Thank you for this feedback. The new documentation was just dropped into
the existing organization. I'll look at a restructuring to make things
clearer.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
