On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Keith E OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:
> What are everyone's first impressions of 2.13.34, the alpha test? > > I remembered to run convert-ly (which worked for me, but I don't have MacOS > 10.4, where James W ran into trouble) but it made very few changes to scores > written for 2.12. > > The change that jumped out at me was the spacing, both of notes and staves. > > Where 2.12 was too timid in trying to fit staves on a page, 2.13 sometimes > tries to fit too many. I had some "between-system-spacing/padding" > assignments in the paper blocks, put there to encourage tighter spacing from > 2.12. The docs indicate that the vertical spacing variables have changed > their structure (I'll have to see if convert-ly flagged them for me) so I > removed them, and was much happier with the output. > > The horizontal spacing now quite aggressively tucks notes under/over the > accidentals of the following notes. Do you consider this desirable? There are a couple bug reports about related things (eg. 1229) Cheers, Joe
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
