Francisco Vila wrote:
2008/11/12 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
For the sake of testing, I booted into my Vista Home Premium partition and
installed the latest Lilypond binary from the download page. I ran a
lilypond file once and it took about 90 seconds, then ran it a second time
and it took more than 60 seconds. The same file on Linux compiles in less
than 2 seconds. Honestly I don't know how anyone uses Vista as their main
OS. This is a reasonably powerful laptop less than 6 months old with 2GB of
RAM and a dual-core processor. I have all the aero eye candy disabled and
it still runs 10x slower than the 8-year-old Gateway box in my office
running Ubuntu 8.04. Man. Glad to be back on the Linux side :)
Added to my FAQ. http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=FAQ
Any ideas for a better A to this Q?
Your answer has one tip (also mentioned previously in this thread) that
I haven't tried--I haven't deleted the fontconfig cache. I'll try to
find it, delete, reinstall, and run again to see if it improves
performance.
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
