I have to say I agree with the OP complaint about slow on Vista. I recently (last weekend) "upgraded" my HP DX5150 (Athlon dual core CPU, 4Gb RAM) from XP to Vista Business, and although I haven't done any timings, Lilypond 2.11.63 is clearly slower on Vista than it was on XP.
It actually wasn't an upgrade in the sense of installing over the top of the existing OS and applications, I reformatted the hard disk and did a clean install. Nick Payne > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Francisco Vila > Sent: Wednesday, 12 November 2008 7:44 PM > To: Hajo Dezelski > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista > > 2008/11/12 Hajo Dezelski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Sometimes ago I had the same problem and I messured the compilation > times of > > one and the same lilypond music file. > > So throw away Vista and you will see light at the end of the tunnel > > This could have changed. It would be fine if you repeated the tests > with current version. > -- > Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) > http://www.paconet.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
