Hans: > On 17 May 2008, at 22:15, Karl Hammar wrote: ... > > I would be nice to be able to do like > > > > lilypond a.ly .. o.ly z.ly > > > > i.e. treat a.ly .. o.ly as if they where included in z.ly, without > > having to say so in z.ly. > > This would walk down the path of C-like compilers.
Is that a bad thing? Actually what I would like is some way to tell on the command line that this run should have /ancient fonts/c-clefs/modern clefs/... so I could easily switch style without having to write a new file. > Have you checked out Haskell <http://haskell.org/> and the compiler > GHC? - Haskell has a module system, which makes it possible for GHC > to compile by > ghc --make a.hs > where "a.hs" is a file containing a "main" function. By the module > system, it is possible to deduce what files to include. One then only > needs to set the library paths somewhere. There is some kind of "library path" in lilypond to find e.g. "gregorian-init.ly" which I don't have in the current directory. > Convenient, though perhaps far from current Lilypond. Regards, /Karl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
