Hello,
does anyone happen to have an answer?
I just can't understand this behavior...

Thank you

Il mer 16 ago 2023, 08:18 Rip _Mus <ripetizioni.mus...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

> Good morning everyone,
> going back to the solution written by David, I found that simply adding
> the Duration_line_engraver causes the example to fail to compile.
> Can anyone tell me why this happens?
>
> Below is the minimal example:
>
> %%%
> global = {
>   s1\break
>   s1\break
>   s1
> }
>
> flOne = \relative c' {
>   e1
>   r1
>   e1
> }
>
> flTwo = \relative c' {
>   c1
>   r1
>   c1
> }
>
> \new StaffGroup \with { \consists "Keep_alive_together_engraver" }
>
> <<
>   \new Staff \with {
>     \RemoveAllEmptyStaves
>     \override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer = 1
>     instrumentName = "Flute 1"
>     shortInstrumentName = "Fl. 1"
>   } <<\global \flOne>>
>   \new Staff \with {
>     \RemoveAllEmptyStaves
>     \override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer = 1
>     instrumentName = "Flute 2"
>     shortInstrumentName = "Fl. 2"
>   } <<\global \flTwo>>
>   \new Staff \with {
>     instrumentName = "Flutes"
>     shortInstrumentName = "Fl. 1-2"
>     \override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer = 2
>   } \partCombine \flOne \flTwo
> >>
>
> \layout {
>   \context {
>     \Voice
>     \consists "Duration_line_engraver"
>   }
> }
> %%%
>
> Il giorno lun 14 ago 2023 alle ore 21:24 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Rip _Mus <ripetizioni.mus...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > wow!!
>> > Now I understand Knute's answer too.
>> > Unfortunately, opening the page in the Italian version, the
>> documentation
>> > relating to the Keep_alive_together_engraver is not there.
>>
>> Its internals are documented, but its remove-layer settings are not
>> really documented as a user-level feature.  Part of the reason is that
>> there should actually be a user-level layer of commands around the core
>> settings, and _that_ should then get user-level documentation.
>>
>> But the skeleton of the feature can be made to walk without being
>> fleshed out.
>>
>> > Thank you very much for the solution, thank you very much!
>>
>> Well, it is more embarrassing than anything.  But occasionally I do
>> catch questions for that functionality.
>>
>> --
>> David Kastrup
>>
>

Reply via email to