Good morning everyone,
going back to the solution written by David, I found that simply adding the
Duration_line_engraver causes the example to fail to compile.
Can anyone tell me why this happens?
Below is the minimal example:
%%%
global = {
s1\break
s1\break
s1
}
flOne = \relative c' {
e1
r1
e1
}
flTwo = \relative c' {
c1
r1
c1
}
\new StaffGroup \with { \consists "Keep_alive_together_engraver" }
<<
\new Staff \with {
\RemoveAllEmptyStaves
\override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer = 1
instrumentName = "Flute 1"
shortInstrumentName = "Fl. 1"
} <<\global \flOne>>
\new Staff \with {
\RemoveAllEmptyStaves
\override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer = 1
instrumentName = "Flute 2"
shortInstrumentName = "Fl. 2"
} <<\global \flTwo>>
\new Staff \with {
instrumentName = "Flutes"
shortInstrumentName = "Fl. 1-2"
\override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer = 2
} \partCombine \flOne \flTwo
>>
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\consists "Duration_line_engraver"
}
}
%%%
Il giorno lun 14 ago 2023 alle ore 21:24 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> ha
scritto:
> Rip _Mus <ripetizioni.mus...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > wow!!
> > Now I understand Knute's answer too.
> > Unfortunately, opening the page in the Italian version, the documentation
> > relating to the Keep_alive_together_engraver is not there.
>
> Its internals are documented, but its remove-layer settings are not
> really documented as a user-level feature. Part of the reason is that
> there should actually be a user-level layer of commands around the core
> settings, and _that_ should then get user-level documentation.
>
> But the skeleton of the feature can be made to walk without being
> fleshed out.
>
> > Thank you very much for the solution, thank you very much!
>
> Well, it is more embarrassing than anything. But occasionally I do
> catch questions for that functionality.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
