Thanks a lot Lukas, 

overriding mensural staff is an optimal solution, but have a look in future to 
baroque music transcriptors, like me…

Best,

Mario


Mario Bolognani
mario.bologn...@gmail.com



> Il giorno 30 dic 2022, alle ore 18:05, Lukas-Fabian Moser <l...@gmx.de> ha 
> scritto:
> 
> Hi Mario,
> 
> Am 30.12.22 um 17:37 schrieb Mario Bolognani:
>> Hi Lukas,
>> 
>> this is the example where I’m using \numericTimeSignature
>> 
>>  \new Staff <<
>>                     \set Staff.instrumentName = \markup \center-column{""}
>>                     \incipit { \clef soprano \key do\major\time 
>> 3/2\numericTimeSignature  r2.^\markup \right-align"[Soprano]"}
>>                     \clef violin
>>                     \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"voice oohs"
>>                     \IIIsoprano
>>                     \set Staff.shortInstrumentName = "sop"
>>                     \new Lyrics \lyricsto "sovrana" \IIItesto
>>                 >>
> 
> Please always aim for short-yet-compilable examples like:
> 
> \version "2.24.0"
> 
> \language italiano
> 
> \new Staff \with {
>   instrumentName = ""
> } <<
>   \incipit {
>     \clef soprano
>     \key do\major
>     \numericTimeSignature
>     \time 3/2
>     r2.}
>   la4
> >>
> 
> At any rate: Yes, this is a complicated case. We noted that the change to 
> \numericTimeSignature (which I made in order to make it work on the 
> score-wide timing) stops it from working in MensuralStaff contexts, and 
> incipits internally use a MensuralStaff, as Jean explained.
> 
> You can replace \numericTimeSignature by \override 
> MensuralStaff.TimeSignature.style = #'numbered, or - if you want to have it 
> for your whole score - you can also do:
> 
> \layout {
>   \context {
>     \MensuralStaff
>     \numericTimeSignature
>   }
> }
> 
> I think the proper fix would be to make \incipit configurable: It's not 
> self-evident to me that incipits should always be created in mensural style 
> (but it is of course a sensible default, given the editing tradition of 
> Renaissance music.)
> 
> Lukas

Reply via email to