On 23.05.2016 02:48, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Do you want to do that or do you want to get close to what Bach wrote? If you
look at the Bach autograph of this piece, available in the Digital Bach
Archive, you will see not only no nachschlag there but hardly any phrasing
slurs, and definitely not the dotted one in your sample image. The ornament in
your edition is an editorial insertion
Hi Andrew,
I think you’re being a bit too rash here. The Henle ‘Urtext’ edition I
have here also has the appoggiatura, written as in Harm’s second
version, and although the Critical Report is laughable in that it
doesn’t even list the sources used I’m sure there is a source from
Bach’s environment that has the ornament, and it’s likely too easy to
just say ‘the autograph is what Bach definitely intended’.
Sorry I can’t say more, maybe I’ll have a look at the NBA at the library.
Best, Simon
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
