David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Heikki Junes <heikki.ju...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks David! >> >> Yes, it provides the exactly the desired result! >> > > Glad I could help! See the attached for a completed adaptation. > > I wonder if this function would better be defined in Scheme than C++.
It's probably called at least once per line. Still, if written reasonably well, a Scheme version is not likely to impact performance measurably: I don't think it calls for exotic data structures/algorithms. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
