2015-08-19 1:13 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: > 2015-08-19 0:34 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Heikki Junes <heikki.ju...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks David! >>> >>> Yes, it provides the exactly the desired result! >> >> >> Glad I could help! See the attached for a completed adaptation. >> >> I wonder if this function would better be defined in Scheme than C++. If >> someone wanted to do something like you're doing, it wouldn't be a trivial >> matter to first redo the function in Scheme to make the necessary changes. > > I'd love to see the KeySig-stencil in scheme in our code-base. > Or at least a method to get acces to those accidentals, something like > ly:note-column-accidentals but for KeySignature.
And then going for 'accidental-grobs > > If I think of all those (very) ugly workarounds to affect a single > accidental ... > > > Best, > Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
