On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 1:02 PM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Trevor Bača <trevorb...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I am concerned by what seems to be an unwillingness to use the term > > "duration" to label things in the system that are clearly durations. > > Computers are not fond of ambiguities. I am concerned by what seems to > be an unwillingness to use consistent terminology while expecting > consistent results. > Hi David, is what's at stake here a desire to use the word "duration" to mean just the LilyPond-specific construct that looks like ... 4.. 16 16. 32.. ... and so on? Is that what's going on here? -- Trevor Bača www.trevorbaca.com soundcloud.com/trevorbaca
