>> Honestly, I think that your criteria for creating pre-release of
>> 2.24 are too rigid. As far as I can see, doing a 2.23.80 release
>> *right now* is the way to go.
>
> Fine, if you disagree with the plan laid out in August, I invite you
> to volunteer taking care of the releases and the related procedures.
> There are reasons behind branching after a development release and
> only doing the release candidate from the branch that make me
> believe it would still be the right way to go.
Sigh. I meant my e-mail as an encouragement, not a critique. Lukas
essentially said the same as I wanted to say, but hopefully with a
better wording.
Werner
