>> I think we should branch now. What do others think?
>
> Needless to say that I agree, but as you witnessed nobody else
> bothers to reply.

Sorry, I got the impression that we already made a decision to do so.
For the record, I also agree.

> Discussions on MRs opened during the weekend also showed me that
> we're not even on one page for what should still go in before
> branching,

As mentioned, I leave this decision to you: Please define a commit
that you want to use for branching.

> and now it seems you went back to feature development.

Why is this a problem?  Isn't the idea that a release is based on a
'stable' branch, and that normal development continues on 'master'?

> By now, I've lost all motivation to do anything for LilyPond...

This is a pity.


    Werner

  • Re: To branch or no... Jean Abou Samra
    • Re: To branch ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
      • Re: To bra... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
        • Re: To... Jean Abou Samra
          • Re... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
            • ... Jean Abou Samra
              • ... Jean Abou Samra
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Kevin Barry
            • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... David Kastrup
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Lukas-Fabian Moser
              • ... Jean Abou Samra
              • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Dan Eble
              • ... Jean Abou Samra

Reply via email to