Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >>> I think we should branch now. What do others think? >> >> Needless to say that I agree, but as you witnessed nobody else >> bothers to reply. > > Sorry, I got the impression that we already made a decision to do so. > For the record, I also agree. > >> Discussions on MRs opened during the weekend also showed me that >> we're not even on one page for what should still go in before >> branching, > > As mentioned, I leave this decision to you: Please define a commit > that you want to use for branching. > >> and now it seems you went back to feature development. > > Why is this a problem? Isn't the idea that a release is based on a > 'stable' branch, and that normal development continues on 'master'?
For that idea to apply, you first need a stable branch. -- David Kastrup
