On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:14 AM Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo, > > > What would you consider more readable? > > The Feta version. > The only objection I have is to the kerning in mf — otherwise, I think the > Feta version is more readable. > > Not so trivial to judge. In my knowledge a dynamic is really readable when it's strongly coupled to the note it belongs to. Otherwise, what is readable is the glyph. When you have m and f separated, the glyph itself it's more readable, but not the pair note-dynamic. And playability doesn't privilege aesthetics... > > I can provide other examples if you are interested. > > Then it is pretty strange that you were interested in commenting on something that is not of your interest ;-) >
