Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> writes: > Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2020, 14:27 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup: >> 7.6 ‘tsort’: Topological sort >> ============================= >> >> [...] >> >> Now of course the non-linear manner of being able to update issues and >> the desire to have cross-reference means that we _will_ have cycles. So >> this is not a cure-all, and cycles may need reediting the issues that >> are broken by cycles. But at least for the more linear reference >> chains, this should be a good help. > > Let me look into how many issue descriptions actually reference other > issues. If there are none (or at least none that reference earlier > issues), we can just be happy with the two-stage approach of migrating > all issues first and add the comments in a second step.
Or migrate first omitting all links in the descriptions, and afterwards update all descriptions with links. One could first create all issues with a stock description, but if that doesn't trigger spam filters I don't know what will. So using the original descriptions in the first pass with links removed... Actually possibly even with links intact. As long as one _can_ resubmit the descriptions afterwards, there should be no problem. -- David Kastrup My replies have a tendency to cause friction. To help mitigating damage, feel free to forward problematic posts to me adding a subject like "timeout 1d" (for a suggested timeout of 1 day) or "offensive".
