Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> writes: > To recap at this point: the worry about gitlab.com is similar to that > wrt guthub: their TOS won't give us a substantial amount of trust in > continuity of service.
The seminal difference being that a workable free version of their software is available for the purpose of self-hosting. That gives an escape hatch that either users or competing services can pick up in the case of contingency. This may seem academical, but even the academical possibility reins in corporate decision makers from performing wholesale changes on a whim. -- David Kastrup
