Am Sonntag, den 09.02.2020, 22:50 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: > Am Freitag, den 07.02.2020, 16:28 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > Il giorno ven 7 feb 2020 alle 10:33, Federico Bruni > > < > > f...@inventati.org > > > > > ha scritto: > > > I guess that the quality of the issue migration might influence the > > > decision. > > > > I forgot I already investigated the SF -> GitLab migration almost 2 > > years ago: > > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Allura-SourceForge-to-Gitlab-migration-td211549.html > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, no progress on the import from Allura: > > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/21747 > > > > > > > > So a migration script needs to be written. > > I've uploaded today's dump of SF issues here (165MB): > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1llmnlKMt-LyhWHGcbSCSdSSKjsT0mTff > > > > > > > > in case someone wants to play with it... > > Thanks for sharing! I put together a simplistic script to create a > proof-of-concept: > https://gitlab.com/lilypond-issues/lilypond/issues > > > It's only 1137 issues (now my server is blacklisted for spamming...)
Correction: It's only issue #2965 that akismet considers spam. Oh well, if I read the documentation correctly, migrating into a private repository and then making it public disables spam checking... So I'll let my server run the script over night and check the result tomorrow. Cheers Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
