Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> writes: > Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2020, 14:16 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup: >> I am not sure of when and how and whether at all it might make sense >> suggesting to GitLab that we would be a good showcase project, being >> ancient and with significant history of different trackers etc. Just >> to reduce the long-term likelihood of us overstaying our welcome >> regarding free resources. Probably something to think about at a >> considerably later point of time. Or when we have significant >> migration problems. > > I don't understand this point. Do you mean we should ask the GitLab > devs for help with the migration?
Not before we run into a serious dead end, I think. I don't mean to say that I understand my point, either. It just feels like if we are using a free offering, we might want to think about what in our project would be useful for making GitLab think it is a good idea hosting us. I have a vague feeling that there is some opportunity for social engineering. I cannot entirely vouch for it since my specialty is more social demolition. -- David Kastrup My replies have a tendency to cause friction. To help mitigating damage, feel free to forward problematic posts to me adding a subject like "timeout 1d" (for a suggested timeout of 1 day) or "offensive".
