> On 21 Oct 2018, at 14:42, Torsten Hämmerle <torsten.haemme...@web.de> wrote: > > Hans Åberg wrote >> If one typesets the file regularE53smufl.ly, one gets output below. Some >> single arrow accidentals are also missing in LilyPond, I think. > > Yes, also single arrow accidentals are missing. > Most notably, we'll have to distinguish between the (bigger) standard arrows > and the smaller multi-arrows. > There are different versions of single arrow accidentals (with standard > arrow and smaller arrow) and even the attachment point is different. > Example: sharp with standard arrow up has the arrow attached on the right, > the smaller arrows are attached on the left. Double-flats are similar.
I looked a little on that, but I do not have any preference. > It's sheer co-incidence that I read about your makam activities an so I > thought I'd drop a note. It is my idea to use the Helmholtz-Ellis notation for Turkish, Arab and Persian music: The single arrows are for Turkish music, and the double arrows are a mean value for the microtonal notes in Arab and Persian music, though strictly, there is no tradition for their exact values. There are two caveats with Turkish notation: One is that is is normally noted a 4th above the sounding pitch. And common AEU (Arel-Ezgi-Uzdilek) swaps the sharp sign for a microtonal sharp. > All the Gould and Stein-Zimmermann accidentals currently contained in > Bravura/Dorico are in scope. You mean i LilyPond? What version. > Nice to know that somebody will be going to actually use them. ;) > My samples shown in this thread are far from showing the complete set, > though. It is a nice application. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
