Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: >> On 20 Oct 2018, at 03:24, Adam Good <goodadamg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I hope this email finds you well. Some questions for you if you have >> time plus I want to share my close to complete turkish makam file >> based on the file you sent me originally plus regular.ly >> >> here's the new makam include file: >> turkish-makam-ADAM.ly >> >> the other file: >> KEY_SIGNATURES_regularE53_TEST.ly >> shows the key signatures plus tonic pitch for quite a number of >> different Turkish makams. > > There may be an issue with your key signatures: The first key should > be (0 . 0) as it refers to the accidental relative C major in key C, > which by tradition is none. So I got: > % Makam Hicazkâr: > makamHicazkar = #'((0 . 0) (1 . -24/53) (2 . -6/53) (3 . 0) (4 . 0) (5 > . -24/53) (6 . -6/53)) > > Whereas you have: > HicazZirgule = #'((0 . 0/53)(1 . -24/53)(2 . -6/53)(3 . 0/53)(4 > . 0/53)(5 . -24/53)(6 . -6/53)) > Hicazkar=\HicazZirgule > > The only difference is that I have 0 in some positions where you have 0/53.
To Scheme that is no difference. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
