Hi,
me too, I would not call it absolute then, because the octaves inside
this command are note absolute anymore. Am I right that the proposal is
an easier way of writing \transpose c <octave> { } ?
Why not just advertise \transpose c c' in the docs? I would consider it
clear and short enough.
And I would not change the names of \relative but rather invent a new
one (like \octavate – just as a (non-convincing) example from the top of
my head), if at all.
Cheers,
Joram
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
