On May 6, 2015, at 14:43 , David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Neither \octave { bes, c d e f } nor \octave c { c' bes as g } or
> \octave c'' { c' bes as g } seem particularly convincing.
+1
> \absolute c { c; bes as g } \absolute c'’ { c' bes as g }
After further thought, and with respect, “meh." \transpose is effective,
mostly obvious, and doesn’t require explaining away things like a pitch
parameter with no effect that must be a c.
Is there anything stopping a user who wants a shorthand for \transpose c X
\absolute from defining one?
—
Dan
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
