dak wrote > Joseph Rushton Wakeling < > joseph.wakeling@
> > writes: > >> On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow >>> that strongly penalizes manual tweaks. Graphically/manually oriented >>> workflows detract from the importance of getting good default >>> typesetting. >> >> I'm not sure that's necessarily the case. Making it easy to >> experiment with manual tweaks could be a very good way of working out >> how things need to be engraved, and thus provide guidance for better >> automated typesetting. > > That must be the reason why the typical Word document features the > consistent use of document styles for arriving at typographically > superior results. > > -- > David Kastrup > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel I honestly have never seen ONE Word document make use of styles. I'm not kidding. In all the docs I've come across in all areas, people never use them. Seriously! :) Now, LibreOffice Writer on the other hand... ----- composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/3-0-tp157489p157553.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
