On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote:
Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow that strongly penalizes manual tweaks. Graphically/manually oriented workflows detract from the importance of getting good default typesetting.
I'm not sure that's necessarily the case. Making it easy to experiment with manual tweaks could be a very good way of working out how things need to be engraved, and thus provide guidance for better automated typesetting.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
