Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> writes: > On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote: >> Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow >> that strongly penalizes manual tweaks. Graphically/manually oriented >> workflows detract from the importance of getting good default >> typesetting. > > I'm not sure that's necessarily the case. Making it easy to > experiment with manual tweaks could be a very good way of working out > how things need to be engraved, and thus provide guidance for better > automated typesetting.
That must be the reason why the typical Word document features the consistent use of document styles for arriving at typographically superior results. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
