Janek Warchoł-2 wrote > Thanks :) However, it actually would be unbearable for me to slow > down so much. It was already hard (for me and Urs) to restrict > ourselves to post no more than 1 time per day. > Frankly, 1 post per week is the _slowest_ pace at which i expect to be > able to blog continuously. (unless i completely run out of ideas, but > that's quite improbable.)
It's great that you have that much content to contribute! Consistency is the main thing, so my suggestion is just to pace ourselves so we can maintain whatever sustainable rate of posting we can manage, and avoid periods of drought. 52 weeks in a year, so think marathon rather than sprint. ;-) Different kinds of blogs have different posting frequencies. I use a feed reader so that probably lowers my expectations about that. Best, -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/maybe-we-could-use-blog-lilypond-org-as-the-blog-s-address-tp146737p146853.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel