2012/1/16 Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>: > I've been thinking more about the previous conversation about stable > releases and coordinating work. > > David seemed unhappy with the idea of a stable release happening once we > got to zero critical issues. My interpretation of his comments was that, > while zero critical issues may be a necessary condition for a stable > release, it is not a sufficient condition. Instead of having a stable > release be a byproduct, it should be planned for, and development adjusted > to make it happen. > > While GOP 9 said that we will treat all contributors as volunteers, and > not assign tasks, I don't think that precludes us from working together. > Somebody who identifies a strong vision can certainly rally volunteers to > the cause.
I'm willing to be lead by a leader. I'd like to invite some friends to contribute to Lily, but i think there are too many changes going on in our workflow now (and i remember Graham said we're not ready for new people). I'm willing to help with sorting this out, but i don't have a clear vision of what should be done and how can i help. I also think that separate release branch would be good, but i don't know how much maintenance work it requires. Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
