Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen <at> byu.edu> writes: > I think a reasonable goal for 2.16 would be: > > 1) Work through the outstanding issues involved in issue 2070
A stable version should not wait for this. This issue removes an obstacle to further clean-up of the input syntax, as explained a bit more under issue 2037. This should improve LilyPond long- term, but might increase bugs in the short term. The other criteria make sense. Qualitatively, LilyPond development versions seem more solid than they did around 2.13.60-ish. > What's left off the list? > B) Guile 2.0. Conventional wisdom is to skip 2.0 releases in favor of 2.2 _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
