David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > "m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes: > >> I think that the major deciding factor will be Guile 2.0 integration. > > We have had no code that has been able to survive basic testing. I > don't think it makes sense to bank on a major feature for an _imminent_ > _stable_ release when it has not even made it into an unstable one, or > even master. It will, of course, be a prime candidate for backporting > once it has suitably stabilized in 2.17. Or we aim for 2.18 to get out > more speedily. > >> Alternatively, if Ian sees the light at the end of the tunnel, then >> it's worth making Guile 2.0 integration the main target of 2.16. > > I think we should focus on the near end of the tunnel these days if we > want to see 2.16 anytime soon.
By the way: the Guile developers try bringing back local-eval in 2.0.4 and that would definitely make the embedded Scheme stuff work nicer. I have no clear idea how that will fit into the scheme of things. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
