On 2011/06/26 12:25:15, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 26 June 2011 13:02, Reinhold Kainhofer
<mailto:reinh...@kainhofer.com> wrote:
> So, I more and more get the impression that the approach of simply
killing the
> line spanner and letting its child dynamic spanners live on is the
wrong
> approach to \breakDynamicSpan and spanner's style=#'none...

Yep, it definitely appears to be too naive.

I think I've now found the proper solution to the problem: Keep the line
spanner alive, but don't add new support points and break it at the end
of the current spanner. New patchset with updated description is up.

Cheers,
Reinhold

http://codereview.appspot.com/4630070/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to