On 2011/06/26 12:25:15, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 26 June 2011 13:02, Reinhold Kainhofer
<mailto:reinh...@kainhofer.com> wrote:
> So, I more and more get the impression that the approach of simply
killing the
> line spanner and letting its child dynamic spanners live on is the
wrong
> approach to \breakDynamicSpan and spanner's style=#'none...
Yep, it definitely appears to be too naive.
I think I've now found the proper solution to the problem: Keep the line spanner alive, but don't add new support points and break it at the end of the current spanner. New patchset with updated description is up. Cheers, Reinhold http://codereview.appspot.com/4630070/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
