On 26 June 2011 13:02, Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com> wrote:
> Hmm, again the problem is that the parts after a line break of broken dynamic > spanners (text / hairpin) do not have any parent set any more... Now, the > function write-system-signature (subfunction found-grob, stencil.scm) calls > ly:grob-extent, which checks for the common refpoint of the spanner and its > parent (which is 0)... I think you're misreading this. The common refpoint is a System; it doesn't have a parent since it's the top-level grob. The problem is that the broken spanner is expecting a different System. > So, I more and more get the impression that the approach of simply killing the > line spanner and letting its child dynamic spanners live on is the wrong > approach to \breakDynamicSpan and spanner's style=#'none... Yep, it definitely appears to be too naive. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
