On 2011/07/03 20:44:48, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 3 July 2011 21:27, <mailto:reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think so. This \breakDynamicSpan breaks the \dim, while the > previous on breaks only the \<. The dim will create a new > DynamicLineSpanner...
Have you removed them and compared the output? They're identical, and both snippets create five DynamicLineSpanner grobs.
Thanks for spotting that. I'll have to investigate tomorrow why this \breakDynamicSpan doesn't have an effect. It properly breaks the spanner if it is placed right before the \p, but not if I put it immediately after the \dim... I.e. the following works: c'1 c1^\<\breakDynamicSpan c'' \break c,,1_\dim f,1\breakDynamicSpan\p \break but this does not: c'1 c1^\<\breakDynamicSpan c'' \break c,,1_\dim\breakDynamicSpan f,1\p \break http://codereview.appspot.com/4630070/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
