Hi Mike,
Nice job, as usual !
However, I noticed some obvious problems. You probably already know
them.
Here, the padding :
\markup {
\footnote b c
\footnote e f
}
Here, the horizontal space between markup and number :
\markup {
\footnote d e
\footnote f g
}
Also : why are in-text numbers 0.75\mm higher than footnotes numbers ?
To conclude, this horizontal spacing bug (3 spacing bugs in 1) :
\markup {
\footnote a a \footnote a a \footnote a a
\footnote a a \footnote a a \footnote a a
\footnote a a \footnote a a \footnote a a
\footnote a a
}
Now, some suggestions :
Can you create another "footnote-numbering-function" that prints "1.
blablabla" instead of the raised numbers ? Maybe with an argument to
define whether there should be a space after the dot.
Optionally another that handles "[1] " notation.
And maybe a property to change font-series and font-shape for these
numbers (those that are in the notes). Indeed, some editors use bold "1.
" while others use italic raised numbers.
There is often a no-break thin space between a word and its note number
in french editions (Flammarion, Le livre de poche, etc).
It would be great if we could this input :
\markup \footnote a { bla bla bla bla bla bla [many others] bla bla bla
bla bla bla }
instead of :
\markup \footnote a \justify { bla bla bla bla bla bla [many others] bla
bla bla bla bla bla }
And it would be even greater if we could use :
\markup a \footnote { bla bla }
instead of :
\markup \footnote a { bla bla }
I know this last issue is very tricky... And it has a low priority.
And again, great job !
Regards,
Bertrand
http://codereview.appspot.com/4244064/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
