[cc: lilypond-devel] This looks great, I don't see a regression test file; are you adding that please?
Jan Mike Solomon schreef op vr 07-01-2011 om 20:54 [-0500]: > Kinda meh, but it gets the job done! I've included three patches, > including the original. > The second preserves the flat beams but gets rid of the crashing lily, > whereas the third implements some bendiness. > > > Cheers, > MS > > > > > > On Jan 7, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Jan Warchoł wrote: > > > 2011/1/7 <m...@apollinemike.com> > > I'm not exactly sure what the desired output would be for > > issue 37, but my code assumes that if there are collision > > problems, flat beams look best. > > > > Lemme know what you think! > > > > > > Judging by my very own personal taste i'd say that when notes are > > not on the same staffline it would look better if the beams were > > slanted; i'd also prefer slightly smaller vertical gap between upper > > beams and noteheads (now it's something like 1 staff space, i'd go > > for 0.5 staff space). And it would be great if beams covered > > stafflines like in regular situations. > > But this is my personal opinion and of course the new output is far > > better than the old one, so keep up the good work! > > > > > > cheers, > > Janek > > _______________________________________________ > > lilypond-devel mailing list > > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
