Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >>> I'm not sure whether using the `natural' angle is really that good >>> – we are entering quite complicated formatting issues... Perhaps >>> applying a damping factor to make the beams less steep? >> >> I think the usual beam slope calculation (which involves dampening) >> should be more or less fine. That's what I meant with "natural >> angle". > > Well, I mean even more damped... But this is just a gut feeling not > founded by real-world examples.
I suppose that the appropriate wheels for dampening in relation to stem length are in lily/beam-quanting.cc but I have no idea how to make this properly interact with the bug fix. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel