Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes:

>>> I'm not sure whether using the `natural' angle is really that good
>>> – we are entering quite complicated formatting issues...  Perhaps
>>> applying a damping factor to make the beams less steep?
>> 
>> I think the usual beam slope calculation (which involves dampening)
>> should be more or less fine.  That's what I meant with "natural
>> angle".
>
> Well, I mean even more damped...  But this is just a gut feeling not
> founded by real-world examples.

I suppose that the appropriate wheels for dampening in relation to stem
length are in lily/beam-quanting.cc but I have no idea how to make this
properly interact with the bug fix.

-- 
David Kastrup

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to