Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >>>> I'm not exactly sure what the desired output would be for issue >>>> 37, but my code assumes that if there are collision problems, flat >>>> beams look best. >>> +1 >> >> Don't agree: the beams usually give an impression of the overall >> pitch tendency. Flat beams over a rising melody line look strange >> and dead. So I think it would be good if they usually kept their >> natural angle, just with uniformly longer stems. > > I'm not sure whether using the `natural' angle is really that good – > we are entering quite complicated formatting issues... Perhaps > applying a damping factor to make the beams less steep?
I think the usual beam slope calculation (which involves dampening) should be more or less fine. That's what I meant with "natural angle". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
