Mike Solomon <mike...@ufl.edu> writes: > Not a problem. > Attached is a leaner and meaner patch that requires no other patches > (it bases off of the master) and implements this. > I've compiled all of the regtests and it breaks none of them. And, > after briefly perusing the output, I don't think it drastically > changes anything.
I've saved my appreciation last time, so for this output I have +2 to offer. And now for something completely different: when looking at those examples, I thought that it might be nice if beam slope was actually based on physical pitch rather than note position, so that something like f-fis gets slope, and something like eis-f doesn't. That idea might likely be catastrophic for beaming across clef changes, though. But I found the straight beaming over things like f-fis a bit disturbing. Clearly, from the point of visual aesthetics, it is the obvious thing to do. I am just not sure whether the non-obvious thing might not be nicer in some way. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
