On 11.12.2008 (22:00), Valentin Villenave wrote: > Both sides are equally important, because it's the feature count that > makes users *and devs* stick with Lily.
I don't know about the devs -- you're probably right that to them, new features are more interesting -- but THIS user sticks with LilyPond because the output is superb. As it is, LP deals with 99% of the western music notation canon, and to me, the perfectioning of that is far more important than filling in the remaining %. Also, a higher priority for me would be to simplify input for the 30% which go beyond simple music expressions and where scheme or fiddling with grob properties are required. For the academic world, I've suggested a five-year enforced writer's block, to give us all a chance to catch up. Something similar for LP would mean: no more features until the buglist is empty :) Eyolf -- rib site n. [by analogy with backbone site] A machine that has an on-demand high-speed link to a backbone site and serves as a regional distribution point for lots of third-party traffic in email and Usenet news. Compare leaf site, backbone site. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
